MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Freon’s Destroy the Stratosphere

2023· article· en· W4386101477 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mustafa Ali Al-Sharoot

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicOil, Gas, and Environmental Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal ProtocolStratosphereOzone layerOzoneOzone depletionEnvironmental scienceTropospheric ozoneAtmosphere (unit)FreonEarth surfaceMeteorologyAtmospheric sciencesGeographyEarth scienceChemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract First of all, we have to know that the ozone layer exists in different levels of the Earth’s atmosphere. After follow-up, it was found that the equivalent of 80% of the ozone is found at altitudes between 16 and 35 kilometres above the earth’s surface. At this level it provides a good sunscreen shield, and we believe that is a good ozone. It is also present at ground level in low concentrations (tropospheric ozone). It is believed that the ozone at this stage is the polluting part and that the smog over the cities is the main part of it and it can be called (bad ozone). Through this thing, we must realize that the international community has not remained silent about air violations and took a number of measures to restore the ozone layer, most notably the Montreal Protocol in 1987. Here it was necessary for all countries of the world to develop solutions that work to gradually get rid of this time bomb by uniting on one decision, It is to stop the production or import of all materials that have a role in the depletion of the ozone because they have a direct impact on the depletion of the stratosphere. This paper seeks to serve two functions. First: it gives fundamental information about the Stratospheric ozone depletion process, with the goal of utilizing current worldwide knowledge on Measures to minimize the use of ozone-depleting compounds existing alternatives and current advances. As a result a supportive framework for Iraq to control its internal problem has been established. Second: an overview of the state of ozone-depleting compounds in Iraq including the industries that use them the difficulties in restricting their use, and the awareness and measures made to reduce their use in Iraq. We believe that this paper will give policymakers with the information they need to solve this issue, such as by giving alternatives and enumerating the roles of environmental protection agencies, user businesses, and the government itself in reducing the use of these compounds. We are convinced that our efforts will assist the general population who is concerned about the ozone layer’s degradation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicOil, Gas, and Environmental IssuesFrench-language works237,207