The Transformational Leadership Model According to the Four Brahmavihara of Charity School Administrators of Buddhist Temples in Northeast Region 3
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to: 1) study the current, desirable condition, and needs of the transformational leadership model based on the Four Brahmavihara of the charity school administrators of the Buddhist Temple in Northeastern Region 3, 2) develop a framework for the transformational leadership model based on the Four Brahmavihara of the charity school administrators of the Buddhist Temple in Northeastern Region 3 and, 3) evaluate the framework for the transformational leadership model based on the Four Brahmavihara of the charity school administrators of the Buddhist Temple in Northeastern Region 3. This research adopts a mixed-methods approach, dividing the study into three phases of implementation. The research findings indicate that: 1) The current state and desired conditions have average scores that are high and highest, respectively. The average score for the desired conditions is higher than the current state in all aspects and issues. Moreover, the essential needs for the transformational leadership model based on the Four Brahmavihara, ranked in order of urgency using the Modified Priority Need Index (PNI modified) technique, are as follows: individualized consideration based on the Four Brahmavihara, intellectual stimulation based on the Four Brahmavihara, inspirational motivation based on the Four Brahmavihara, and idealized influence based on the Four Brahmavihara respectively. 2) The framework for leadership transformation based on the Four Brahmavihara comprises the following components: the framework's name, objectives, principles and concepts, and the content of each component. These components encompass the principles, concepts, objectives, content, integration according to the Four Brahmavihara, and expected outcomes. 3) The results of the evaluation of the framework for leadership transformation based on the Four Brahmavihara indicate that it is highly suitable, feasible, and beneficial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".