MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386138788 · doi:10.3389/feart.2023.1220590

The utility of the Upper Triassic conodont Primatella in Tethyan-Panthalassan correlation around the Carnian-Norian boundary

2023· article· en· W4386138788 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michael J. Orchard

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Earth Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConodontPaleontologyGeologyGondwanaTerraneGenusMesozoicRidgeDiachronousStructural basinLaurentiaPeninsulaBiostratigraphyOrdovicianGeographyTectonicsArchaeologyEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Upper Triassic conodont genus Primatella is important for recognizing the Carnian-Norian stage boundary in Panthalassan and Tethyan domains. Originally based on Canadian material from Black Bear Ridge in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, two key species are highlighted, and their occurrence is documented in the allochthonous Wrangellia and Alexander terranes in the North American Cordillera; in the Great Basin in Nevada, western United States; at Pizzo Mondello, Sicily, in western Tethys; and in Timor-Leste on the southeastern margin of the Meso-Tethys Ocean (northeastern Gondwana). The correlation potential of Primatella species is compromised by a differing nomenclature employed in Tethyan regions of Europe where Primatella species have been assigned to other genera, namely, Ancyrogondolella (formerly Epigondolella ), Carnepigondolella , and Metapolygnathus . This has obscured phyletic relationships and impacted the stratigraphic utility of two demonstrably cosmopolitan species, P. asymmetrica and P. bifida . These species are shown to occur widely in a variety of paleoenvironments and have a restricted stratigraphic range around the CNB for which they can be adopted as useful indices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Earth ScienceSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207