MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386138999 · doi:10.4103/0028-3886.383841

Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score can Predict Severity of Spasticity and Functional Outcome in Ischemic Stroke Survivors

2023· article· en· W4386138999 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ravi Sankaran

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology India · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSpasticityIschemic strokeStroke (engine)Physical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyOutcome (game theory)CardiologyIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Post-stroke spasticity is common and an early predictor of the severity of spasticity can help track recovery trajectory helping to modify rehabilitation plans. Objectives: We explored the utility of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) to predict functional motor capacity in patients after acute ischemic stroke. Methods: One hundred and one patients (mean age of 58.6 ± 7.6 years; M:F = 72: 29) with the first documented acute ischemic stroke were followed up for three to twelve months after the stroke. Cerebral lesions within the territory of the middle cerebral artery were evaluated using the ASPECTS. Spasticity was assessed using the Modified Ashworth Score (MAS) and walking with Timed Up and Go test (TUG). The associations between severity of spasticity and size/extent of infarct as derived from ASPECTS and between spasticity and functional walking in post-stroke survivors were analyzed. Results: Among the patients studied, 61.3% (n = 62) had infarct in the region of supply of the left middle cerebral artery (MCA) and 38.7% (n = 39) had infarct in the region supplied by the right MCA. Three percent (n = 3) had a low ASPECTS, 53.6% (n = 54) had an intermediate score and 44.4% (n = 44) had a high score. The majority of patients with no to mild spasticity had high ASPECTS. Worse spasticity was significantly associated with low ASPECTS (P = 0.001). High scores in Timed Up and Go test (TUG) were associated with low ASPECTS (P < 0.001). Patients with high ASPECTS had the propensity to have subcortical infarcts (P < 0.001) when compared to those with moderate ASPECTS, who had a mix of cortical and subcortical infarcts. Conclusion: ASPECTS at admission in patients with acute ischemic stroke is a good predictor of post-stroke spasticity and functional walking. Low ASPECTS is associated with higher spasticity and lower functional walking status on follow-up after stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology IndiaSame topicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207