Preface and Acknowledgments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book stems from collaborative research undertaken by members of the AGREE (Aboriginal Government, Resources, Economy, and Environment) research program from 1991 to the present as well as by others who, in one way or another (e.g., through symposia, workshops, or informal consultation) became involved with our examination of common issues.In responding to the sometimes incremental, sometimes sudden, subordination and dispossession imposed by macro-political and economic orders, northern First Nations are compelled to negotiate "space" for themselves across a broad spectrum of territorial, institutional, and symbolic practices.While these interconnected aspects cannot easily -and indeed should not -be compartmentalized, they cluster around certain cultural priorities, political flashpoints, persistent conundrums, and hopes for transcendence and reconciliation.These have provided some direction for organizing the chapters of this book into five parts.Part 1, Perspectives on the General Issues, offers an overview by the editor of the volume, followed by the ground-level insights of a prominent First Nations leader.Both chapters perceive inherent connections between political subordination, territorial dispossession, and suffering; and between re-entitlement, autonomy, and community healing.Part 2, (Re)defining Territory, addresses the all-important issue of reinforcing authority over homelands and waters -an issue so basic to Aboriginal cultural and political identity, and a seemingly inarguable prerequisite for material improvement and autonomy.The chapters in this part address how Aboriginal collectivities seek to redefine the effects of "Crown" property, political boundaries, and the jurisdictional claims of the state; they also address how the strategic redefinition and hybridization of territorial forms reciprocally reshape Aboriginal conceptions and practice.Part 3, Resource Management and Development Conflicts, follows quite logically from Part 2.Here the cut-and-thrust of renegotiating jurisdictional and property rights is explored across a representative range of contests
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.255 | 0.163 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".