Neurologic and psychiatric features of impending neurodegeneration in iRBD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Idiopathic rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is linked to Parkinson's disease and other alpha-synucleinopathies, but various subsets of iRBD may not carry equal risk (i.e., those with depression are at higher risk than those without). Here, we prospectively focus on neurologic and psychiatric aspects of subjects with iRBD, in an attempt to determine what factors are prominent in those who undergo phenoconversion as opposed to those who do not. Methods: We analyzed data from the "REM Sleep Behavior Disorder Associations with Parkinson's Disease Study (RAPiDS)" cohort both at baseline and then at follow-up evaluations (1 to 3 years later) utilizing several neurologic batteries, including the Movement Disorder Society's Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease (QUIP), the 10-M Walk Test (10MWT), and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Determination of phenoconversion was ascertained from physical examination and medical chart review from the initial evaluation onward. Results: Of those who completed both evaluations, there were 33 subjects with iRBD, with an average age of 63.1 ± 12.8 years, with 9 women and 24 men. Of these, 8 (24%) iRBD subjects developed neurodegenerative illness, and demonstrated multiple areas of neurologic and psychiatric signs and symptoms, such as speech and movement problems as well as anxiety and depression. Conclusions: Our data adds to the literature regarding risk of phenoconversion in those with iRBD. Further study will be needed, but it is clear that not all subjects with iRBD present the same risk for neurodegeneration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".