Assessment of verbal and visual episodic memory, post-concussive complaints, and their relathionship following mild traumatic brain injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neuropsychological deficits following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) are usually discrete and sometimes difficult to detect. The aim of this study was to evaluate relationships between episodic memory and post-concussive symptoms (PCS). The sample was composed of 55 participants (aged 20 to 64 years), including 25 patients with mTBI and 30 healthy control participants. Participants completed the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) and the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (ROCF), and questionnaires measuring the intensity of memory complaints, fatigue, and sleep quality. Analysis of the data revealed: (a) no significant differences between both groups in episodic memory performance, in either the verbal or visual modalities (b) the intensity of PCS was significantly higher than expected in the normal population (no PCS symptoms), (c) no significant association was found between PCS and memory performance. These results suggest that, despite the fact that patients with mTBI complain of significant memory difficulties and PCS, the neuropsychological tests most commonly used in clinics, do not objectify the memory complaints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".