Tritium and trees: A bomb peak perspective on soil water dynamics in semi-arid apple orchards
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the relationship between agroforest age and soil water dynamics is crucial for effective land and water resources management. However, the complexities of these dynamics, such as soil water recharge and depletion, hamper in-depth understanding, particularly in water-scarce regions. In this study, we examined soil water recharge and depletion in relation to the stand age of apple trees, a widely planted and representative deep-rooted agroforest, over four years in a semi-arid region on China’s Loess Plateau (CLP). We collected soil cores to >20 m depth from four apple orchards (referred to as ‘agroforests’) with variable stand ages (established in 2008, 2005, 1998, and 1994). For comparison, we selected adjacent cropland as land use prior to agroforestry practices (‘control’). We measured soil water content and tritium distributions to model soil water dynamics and estimate water ages across different soil profiles. Our results show that recharge amounts (and depths) in shallow soils were 298.4 mm (7 m), 303.4 mm (6.6 m), 300.6 mm (5.4 m), and 483.1 mm (7.6 m), whereas deep soils had net depletions of 111.1 mm, 391.9 mm, 192.8 mm, and 108.9 mm for AP2008, AP2005, AP1998, and AP1994, respectively. The tritium peak depths, which indicate the 1963 bomb peak depth, significantly differed between agroforested and non-agroforested plots. In particular, agroforestation reduced the seepage velocity of soil water over 20 years. Furthermore, our tritium tracer water age model suggests that the age of transpired deep soil water exceeded 200 years in the oldest orchard. These findings highlight a complex interaction between newly infiltrated water and existing water, possibly due to variations in soil pore size distributions. The results of this study offer valuable insights into the ecohydrological impacts of agroforestation on the CLP and in similar climatic regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".