MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exploring the Conversion Limits of Bitumen Visbreaking through a Molecular Reaction Model

2023· article· en· W4386196633 on OpenAlexafffund
Anton Alvarez‐Majmutov

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersOffice of Energy Research and Development
KeywordsAsphalteneCokeCrackingAsphaltRaw materialChemistryWork (physics)ThermodynamicsProcess engineeringOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide In this work, a visbreaking reaction model was extended to represent a regime where coke formation becomes significant (>1 wt %) in order to better understand the conversion limits when the process is applied to partial upgrading of bitumen. The proposed model reconstructs the molecular composition of the feedstock and then simulates thermal cracking reactions at the molecular level using Monte Carlo algorithms. The model’s reactivity parameters were calibrated against bitumen visbreaking data from a pilot plant. Structural and theoretical solubility criteria were implemented to identify hydrocarbon molecules in the feed and products as saturates, aromatics, resins, asphaltenes, and coke. Model simulations extending over the entire range of conversion (11–36%) obtained in the pilot plant enabled tracking changes in product composition and properties fairly accurately and were able to predict behaviors that characterize the visbreaking conversion limit, such as the formation of new asphaltenes above 20% conversion and the onset of coking at 26% conversion. In the second part of this work, the model was applied to study the effect of asphaltene removal from the feed without making changes to the original reaction model parameters. The model was proven to give reasonable predictions for the cracking of the deasphalted feedstock in terms of product distribution and new asphaltene formation in the conversion range tested experimentally (13–56%). However, the predictions for coke yields were not validated due to the absence of experimental data, and for this reason, the conversion limit of the deasphalted feedstock was not characterized in detail. The issues identified in the predictions for the deasphalted feedstock were largely attributed to insufficient analytical information on the feed to obtain a more precise representation of its composition and reaction chemistry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207