MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386203272 · doi:10.1016/j.ymgmr.2023.101004

An unusually mild case of biotin-thiamine-responsive basal ganglia disease

2023· article· en· W4386203272 on OpenAlexaff
Gurnoor Lail, Susan Blasér, Michal Inbar‐Feigenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineContext (archaeology)Basal gangliaThiaminePutamenEncephalopathyBasal ganglia diseaseDysphagiaPediatricsDystoniaPathologyInternal medicinePsychiatrySurgeryBiologyCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biotin-Thiamine-Responsive Basal Ganglia Disease (BTBGD) is a treatable neurometabolic condition associated with pathogenic variants in the SLC19A3 gene. The classical childhood-onset phenotype presents at a mean age of 4 years, ranging from birth to 12 years. These patients present with subacute encephalopathy, dysarthria, dysphagia, dystonia, external ophthalmoplegia, seizures, quadriparesis, and even death. Chronically, an MRI brain reveals atrophy and necrosis of the basal ganglia. A 16-year-old girl presented in the context of pneumonia with gradual-onset, slowly progressive neurological symptoms. These initial symptoms self-resolved, without treatment with biotin or thiamine, though she had persistent concerns with her writing and memory. MRI brain noted bilateral abnormal signals in the basal ganglia, involving the head and body of the caudate nuclei and the putamen. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) revealed homozygosity for a likely pathogenic variant in the SLC19A3 gene, c.517A > G (p.N173D). Her residual neurological symptoms resolved with biotin and thiamine treatment, with the exception of ongoing memory concerns. We describe a patient presenting with an atypical form of the classical childhood-onset phenotype of BTBGD. Our case emphasizes that BTBGD is a condition that should be considered as a potential diagnosis in all children, including older children, presenting with the new onset of even minor neurological deficits in the context of illness. It highlights the importance of brain MRI and WES in identifying patients with atypical presentations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Genetics and Metabolism ReportsSame topicAlcoholism and Thiamine DeficiencyFrench-language works237,207