Functional outcome after total hip replacement surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Total hip replacement (THR) surgery is a common and effective procedure to alleviate pain and improve function in patients with hip joint disorders, such as osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to assess the functional outcome after THR surgery. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in department of orthopedics, medical college for women and hospital and other hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh, during the period from March 2017 to March 2022. The sample size was 120. Results: In this study, mean age was 65.3 (SD±9.8) years and majority (52.5%) were male. At the 12-month follow-up, PCS scores improved, while MCS scores slightly decreased. Physical function, mental health, and PROM scores of Harris hip score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), and EQ-VAS showed significant improvements. Gait speed exhibited a minor decrease. The complications observed included superficial infection in 6 patients (5.0%), femoral nerve palsy in 9 patients (7.5%), hip dislocation in 7 patients (5.8%) and etc. Overall, 81.67% had an excellent functional outcome, 11.67% had a good outcome, and 6.67% had a fair outcome after surgery. Conclusions: The findings of our study demonstrate significant improvements in functional outcomes and PROMs following THR surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".