Bibliographic record
Abstract
The report focuses on operations of a cable pulley system within the nose landing gear of a Bombardier Global Express. The Manual release system is observed to lose pre-tension in the nose landing gear cable loop. Series of tests were performed to single out two possibilities that could be responsible for the tension loss. The two main causes were identified as structural deformation within the system and cable creep over time. With these tests it was confirmed that there is loss in tension when pulley cluster assembly was subjected to fixed load for longer duration of time, whereas, when the pulley cluster assembly was tested under similar loading for 5 days, negligible loss in tension was observed. The test was designed to last for 53 days but due to the outbreak of a pandemic, the entire test took 105 days to be completed. Additional investigation to eliminate stress relaxation within the cable within the structure, as a possible cause for the tension loss, will have to be carried after this test. Unwinding of the cable in the pulley cluster assembly was determined to be the primary cause of tension loss. The reason for the loss in tension could be a combination of both the above-mentioned causes. However, the test protocols performed here reveal the tension drop but more tests are required to conclusively determine the reason for tension drop.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".