SNAP-25, but not SNAP-23, is essential for photoreceptor function and survival in mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Vesicular transport plays critical roles in photopigment delivery at photoreceptor outer segments and glutamate exocytosis at photoreceptor synapses. Previous studies into the role of photoreceptor SNAP proteins are limited in their characterizations into only gene/protein expression and do not delve further into their functional role. Here, we examine the expression and localization of SNAP-23 and SNAP-25 mRNA and protein. Using SNAP-23 and SNAP-25 conditional knockout mice, we further evaluated the morphological and functional consequences that the absence of these proteins has on vision. Although we found that the ubiquitously expressed SNAP-23 showed weak mRNA expression in photoreceptors, removal of SNAP-23 did not result in any observable phenotype. We found that neuronal SNAP-25 is developmentally regulated and SNAP-25 mRNA undergoes mRNA trafficking to the photoreceptor inner segments coinciding with the development of photoreceptor outer segments. Removal of SNAP-25 in photoreceptor cells led to changes in both outer segment protein trafficking and synaptic integrity, resulting in a complete loss of vision in SNAP-25 cKO mice. Our results conclude that SNAP-25, but not SNAP-23, is the essential isoform for photoreceptor survival and function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".