Successful Transjugular Portosystemic Shunt Treatment of Pediatric Sinusoidal Obstruction: Case Report and Review of Literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: In adults with medically refractory sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been used successfully to improve portal hypertension and symptoms such as ascites. There is limited data on the use of TIPS for SOS in pediatric patients. Methods: The index case was reviewed retrospectively. PubMed and Medline databases were searched to identify other cases. Results: A 4-year-old male with high-risk neuroblastoma, developed SOS after tandem autologous stem cell transplant. He was medically managed with defibrotide, diuretics, and peritoneal drainage, but, due to refractoriness, he underwent TIPS day +54 following bone marrow transplant. Hepatic venous pressure gradient improved from 17 to 8 mm Hg following TIPS placement with significant improvement in the patient's clinical status and ascites. However, 15 months later, his shunt remained patent, and he remains clinically well with stable liver enzymes. A literature review identified 13 pediatric cases of TIPS for SOS due to varied causes. TIPS caused a median hepatic venous pressure gradient of 9 mmHg (range, 2-38 mm Hg). The mortality following the procedure was 15%, with 2 cases who died at 2- and 11-days post-TIPS. At the time of the last follow-up (range 8-25 months), 5 patients were alive, and 8 were lost to follow-up. Conclusion: We present here a pediatric case of SOS due to stem cell transplant treated successfully with TIPS with a review of the literature. A timely, individualized application of TIPS can be effective in treating children with medication-refractory SOS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".