MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386225415 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c03342

Plant-Based Bioactive Phthalates Derived from<i>Hibiscus rosa-sinensis</i>: As In Vitro and In Silico Enzyme Inhibition

2023· article· en· W4386225415 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFood Science and Nutritional Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersHigher Education Commision, PakistanKing Saud University
KeywordsPhthalateChemistryIn silicoEthyl acetateAntioxidantTraditional medicineHibiscusDibutyl phthalateChromatographyBiochemistryBotanyOrganic chemistryBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Hibiscus rosa-sinensis is an attractive, ever-blossoming, and effortlessly available plant around the globe. The fabulous flowers of H. rosa-sinensis enjoy a significant status in folk medicine throughout the world and comprise a range of phyto constituents due to which this splendid flower owns numerous biological and pharmaceutical activities like antioxidant, antifungal, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, antidiabetic, and antifertility activity. Considering this, column chromatographic isolation of the phytoconstituents of ethyl acetate fraction of the flowers of H. rosa-sinensis was performed. A series of five phthalates including Di- n -octyl phthalate ( HR1 ), ditridecyl phthalate ( HR2 ), 1-allyl 2-ethyl phthalate ( HR3 ), diethyl phthalate ( HR4 ), and bis (6-methylheptyl) phthalate ( HR5 ) were isolated. The structures of the isolated phthalates were elucidated by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, 1 H NMR, and 13 C NMR. In silico and in vitro antidiabetic and antioxidant potential and DFT studies of isolated phthalates were carried out. In our study, isolated ligands were explored as potent antidiabetic as well as antioxidant agents as they exhibited good binding affinity (in in vitro and in silico experiments) against all selected protein targets. Compounds HR1–HR5 showed that the binding affinity value ranged from −5.9 to −5.2 kcal/mol, −5.5 to −4.3 kcal/mol, and −5.0 to −4.1 kcal/mol for target proteins 1HNY, 2I3Y, and 5O40, respectively. Among all isolated phthalates, HR5 can be a lead compound as it showed the best binding affinity with human pancreatic α-amylase (Δ G = −5.9 kcal/mol) and displayed a minimum inhibition concentration (IC 50 ) of 11.69 μM among all phthalates. Compound HR1 was the best docked and scored compound for inhibiting glutathione peroxidase; however, HR2 possessed the lowest binding score of −5.0 kcal/mol, thus indicating the highest potential among isolated phthalates for inhibiting the superoxide dismutase. Furthermore, the top-ranked docked ligand–protein complex for each protein was assessed for stability of protein and complex mobility by molecular dynamics simulation using the IMOD server.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it