MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386227398 · doi:10.51161/clinvet2023/22719

REVISÃO DE LITERATURA DA SÍNDROME RESPIRATÓRIA DOS BRAQUICEFÁLICOS

2023· article· pt· W4386227398 on OpenAlexaff
isabella souza da fonseca

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicMyasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Canadian institutionsAdidas (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Sndrome Braquiceflica compe-se de uma ou mais combinaes de anormalidades anatmicas e funcionais provocando sinais de obstruo de vias areas devido a conformao do crnio desses animais. Dentro dessas anormalidades esto estenose das narinas, prolongamento do palato mole, aumento das tonsilas, sculos larngeos evertidos, estreitamento da glote, hipoplasia de traqueia, colapso de laringe ou traqueia. Os animais podem apresentar estas patologias de forma isolada ou combinada e em diversos graus. OBJETIVOS: Visar a importncia da correo cirrgica das anormalidades para uma melhor qualidade de vida ao animal. METODOLOGIA: Apesar do tratamento cirrgico ser o mtodo mais eficaz para a correo da sndrome, o tutor pode optar por seguir o tratamento paliativo clnico, que consiste na conduta de evitar estmulos estressantes, locais muito quentes, exerccios fsicos exacerbados e sobrepeso. J o tratamento cirrgico da sndrome deve ser tratada de cranial para ventral, a fim de evitar cirurgias mais invasivas. Portanto, a estenose das narinas o primeiro passo a ser modificado podendo prevenir mudanas secundrias, como protruso do tecido mole da nasofaringe ou colapso da laringe e traqueia. O prolongamento de palato deve ser corrigido para prevenir interferncia com epiglote. A everso dos sacos larngeos e o colapso larngeo so sequelas de estenoses mais rostrais. A everso dos sculos larngeos removida com tesouras longas. RESULTADOS: O prognstico depende da idade do animal quando foi operado e o quo gravemente

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0140.013
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMyasthenia Gravis and ThymomaFrench-language works237,207