MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386245710 · doi:10.2140/jsag.2023.13.33

Finding points on varieties with Macaulay2

2023· article· en· W4386245710 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Software for Algebra and Geometry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPolynomial and algebraic computation
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of Manitoba
FundersSimons FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsVariety (cybernetics)Dimension (graph theory)MathematicsPoint (geometry)Matrix (chemical analysis)Finite fieldField (mathematics)Pure mathematicsCombinatoricsComputer scienceAlgebra over a fieldGeometryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present RandomPoints, a package in Macaulay2 designed mainly to identify rational and geometric points in a variety over a finite field.We provide tools to estimate the dimension of a variety.We also present methods to obtain nonvanishing minors of a given size in a given matrix, by evaluating the matrix at a point.• randomPoints: This tries to find a point in the vanishing set of an ideal.(Section 2)• dimViaBezout: This tries to compute the dimension of an algebraic set by intersecting with hyperplanes.(Section 3.1)• projectionToHypersurface and genericProjection: These functions provide customizable projection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.321

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it