A Reversible Transformer for LiDAR Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The success of transformer networks in the natural language processing and 2D vision domains has encouraged the adaptation of transformers for 3D computer vision tasks. However, majority of the existing approaches employ standard back-propagation (SBP) - which requires the storage of model activations on a forward pass for use during the backward pass - making their memory complexity linearly proportional to model depth, hence inefficient. Furthermore, most 3D point transformers use the classic QK(V) matrix multiplication design which comes with a memory bottleneck. To address these issues, we propose a memory-efficient point transformer that makes use of reversible functions and linearized self-attention to minimize SBP and transformer memory complexities, respectively. Experimental results on benchmark datasets (Toronto3D and CSPC) from different sensor platforms (aerial, and mobile backpack) show that our approach uses less than half the number of model parameters (compared to its SBP counterpart), take more than twice the input sequence, and use less than half the memory compared to majority of the traditional approach. Overall, the proposed RPT attained competitive performance compared to the state-of-the-art.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".