MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386254517 · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00021.2023

The effect of hypoxemia on muscle sympathetic nerve activity and cardiovascular function: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2023· review· en· W4386254517 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael M. Tymko, D Young, Daniel Vergel, Brittany A. Matenchuk, Lauren Maier, Allison Sivak, Margie H. Davenport, Craig D. Steinback

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of GuelphUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersHeart And Stroke Foundation Of QuebecMichael Smith Health Research BCNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsHypoxemiaMedicineCardiologyHeart ratePopulationInternal medicineAnesthesiaEffects of high altitude on humansMeta-analysisBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of acute poikilocapnic, high-altitude, and acute isocapnia hypoxemia on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and cardiovascular function. A comprehensive search across electronic databases was performed until June 2021. All observational designs were included: population (healthy individuals); exposures (MSNA during hypoxemia); comparators (hypoxemia severity and duration); outcomes (MSNA; heart rate, HR; and mean arterial pressure, MAP). Sixty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis. MSNA burst frequency increased by a greater extent during high-altitude hypoxemia [ P < 0.001; mean difference (MD), +22.5 bursts/min; confidence interval (CI) = −19.20 to 25.84] compared with acute poikilocapnic hypoxemia ( P < 0.001; MD, +5.63 bursts/min; CI = −4.09 to 7.17) and isocapnic hypoxemia ( P < 0.001; MD, +4.72 bursts/min; CI = −3.37 to 6.07). MSNA burst amplitude was only elevated during acute isocapnic hypoxemia ( P = 0.03; standard MD, +0.46 au; CI = −0.03 to 0.90), and MSNA burst incidence was only elevated during high-altitude hypoxemia [ P < 0.001; MD, 33.05 bursts/100 heartbeats; CI = −28.59 to 37.51]. Meta-regression analysis indicated a strong relationship between MSNA burst frequency and hypoxemia severity for acute isocapnic studies ( P < 0.001) but not acute poikilocapnia ( P = 0.098). HR increased by the same extent across each type of hypoxemia [ P < 0.001; MD +13.81 heartbeats/min; 95% CI = 12.59–15.03]. MAP increased during high-altitude hypoxemia ( P < 0.001; MD, +5.06 mmHg; CI = 3.14–6.99), and acute isocapnic hypoxemia ( P < 0.001; MD, +1.91 mmHg; CI = 0.84–2.97), but not during acute poikilocapnic hypoxemia ( P = 0.95). Both hypoxemia type and severity influenced sympathetic nerve and cardiovascular function. These data are important for the better understanding of healthy human adaptation to hypoxemia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0170.032
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative PhysiologySame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207