Identification and Control of Rehabilitation Robots with Unknown Dynamics: A New Probabilistic Algorithm Based on a Finite-Time Estimator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The control of rehabilitation robots presents a formidable challenge owing to the myriad of uncharted disturbances encountered in real-world applications. Despite the existence of several techniques proposed for controlling and identifying such systems, many cutting-edge approaches have yet to be implemented in the context of rehabilitation robots. This highlights the necessity for further investigation and exploration in this field. In light of this motivation, we introduce a pioneering algorithm that employs a finite estimator and Gaussian process to identify and forecast the uncharted dynamics of a 2-DoF knee rehabilitation robot. The proposed algorithm harnesses the probabilistic nature of Gaussian processes, while also guaranteeing finite-time convergence through the utilization of the Lyapunov theorem. This dual advantage allows for the effective exploitation of the Gaussian process’s probabilistic capabilities while ensuring reliable and timely convergence of the algorithm. The algorithm is delineated and the finite time convergence is proven. Subsequently, its performance is investigated through numerical simulations for estimating complex unknown and time-varying dynamics. The results obtained from the proposed algorithm are then employed for controlling the rehabilitation robot, highlighting its remarkable capability to provide precise estimates while effectively handling uncertainty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".