Association Between Power Doppler Ultrasound Signals and Chronic Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Cross-Sectional Explorative Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Some patients experience chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) despite the absence of clinical or radiographic abnormalities. Postoperative synovitis as a cause of CPSP after TKA has received limited research attention. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between synovitis after TKA and CPSP. Patients and Methods: A total of 111 knees of 85 patients, with at least 1-year post-TKA follow-up, were assessed retrospectively and cross-sectionally. Power Doppler (PD) ultrasonography was used to detect the synovial hypervascularity associated with synovitis. The knee joint was divided into 15 areas, and PD signals were graded semi-quantitatively (0-3) in each area, the sum of which was defined as the total PD score. Clinical information regarding CPSP, including the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscales, was recorded. The relationship between pain and PD ultrasonography findings was accessed. Patients were divided into two groups (CPSP+ and CPSP- groups) based on pain severity. Clinical information, including PD ultrasonography findings and other possible causes, was compared between the groups. Results: The WOMAC pain subscale was significantly correlated with the total PD score and maximum PD grade (r=0.3977, p<0.0001; r=0.2797, p=0.0029; respectively). The CPSP+ group had a significantly higher maximum PD grade and total PD score than the CPSP- group (median [interquartile range]: 2 [1, 2] vs 1 [1, 2], p=0.0001; 6 [2, 11] vs 2 [1, 4], p=0.0002; respectively). Multiple and logistic regression analyses showed that the total PD score was an independent factor for the WOMAC pain subscale (β=0.3822, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.1460, 0.6184, p=0.00176) and CPSP (odds ratio=1.19, 95% CI=1.01, 1.41, p=0.0424). Conclusion: This study indicated a possible association between the total PD score and chronic pain after TKA; however, further studies are needed to corroborate these findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".