288 Propranolol Use in Adult Burn Patients: Results from a Multi-center Safety and Efficacy Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction The hypermetabolic response induced by a large burn is associated with increased cardiac work, total body wasting, and impaired physical function, leading to delays in psychosocial recovery and reintegration into society, and persistence of chronic conditions. Modulation of this response could reduce long-term burn morbidity. Catecholamines drive burn-induced hypermetabolism, therefore clinicians have employed the non-selective beta-adrenergic receptor blocker propranolol to reduce cardiac stress and the hypermetabolic response. Here, in a masked, placebo-controlled study, we investigated the safety and efficacy of the administration of propranolol to adult burn patients during the acute hospitalization period. Methods Adults with large burns (n=157, mean 38 ± 15% TBSA) were enrolled at 13 participating centers. Subjects were randomized to receive placebo (n=75) or propranolol (n=82) with data collected for 72 and 79 subjects, respectively. Propranolol administration was initiated with an oral dose of 0.2 mg/kg dose and adjusted to decrease mean heart rate by 20%. The primary endpoint was effect on cardiac rate pressure product (CRPP), while the secondary endpoints included infections and survival. Adverse events were also tracked. Assessments were conducted between the time of consent and discharge, with a long-term follow-up visit occurring approximately 5 months post-burn on average. Results CRPP was significantly reduced with propranolol during the acute hospitalization period (p< 0.0001, Fig 1). The initial dose of propranolol adequately reduced heart rate in most patients. Infections were not different between cohorts. Cardiac complications (atrial arrhythmias, ventricular arrhythmias, cardiac arrest) occurred at similar rates for each group, as did additional complications (abdominal compartment syndrome, deep vein thromboses, pneumothorax, pulmonary embolus). Mortality was similar for both the placebo and propranolol cohorts. Post-discharge heart rates and blood pressures were similar in both groups at approximately 5 months following injury. Conclusions This study demonstrates that the short-term administration of propranolol to adults with large burns decreases CRPP without increasing complications, infections, or mortality. Furthermore, a safe dosing strategy was identified. This strategy may be effective for reducing acute cardiac stress and hypermetabolism. Future studies should focus on the effects of propranolol administration for longer periods, determining the effects on additional endpoints like the hypermetabolic response, pathologic scarring, long-term cardiac dysfunction, whether smaller burns benefit from the administration of propranolol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".