MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386278730 · doi:10.1080/00295450.2023.2240160

Natural Analogue Studies in Support of Post-Closure Safety Assessment of Deep Geological Disposal

2023· article· en· W4386278730 on OpenAlexaffabout
Zhenze Li, T.S. Nguyen, Matthew N. Herod, Julie J. Brown, Hamed Mozafarishamsi

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicRadioactive element chemistry and processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaCanadian Nuclear Safety Commission
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Safety caseErosionGeologyGlacial periodRadioactive wasteNatural (archaeology)Earth scienceEnvironmental scienceGeomorphologyRisk analysis (engineering)PaleontologyWaste managementEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural analogues are systems that have evolved over geological timescales with features similar to one or several components of a deep geological repository (DGR). Natural analogues complement short-duration laboratory studies since they are existing reflections of many long-term processes that might affect the performance of a repository. Mathematical models are often used for the post-closure safety assessment of a DGR. Confidence in the models’ predictions is enhanced when the models successfully simulate the past evolution of a natural analogue. This paper summarizes the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission’s (CNSC’s) recent research on natural analogues to inform on (1) glacial erosion, (2) engineered barrier system, and (3) uranium reactive transport in the context of DGRs for radioactive wastes. Glaciation and its erosion are prominent factors impacting the performance of future DGRs at high latitudes in the northern hemisphere. The authors have reviewed the field data from the Greenland Analogue Project, developed a conceptual and mathematical model for the simulation of the thermal conditions within the Greenland ice sheet, as well as the thermal-hydraulic conditions at its base and the ice sheet velocity, and eventually estimated the erosion rate at the site.The Cigar Lake Analogue demonstrates the long-term radionuclide containment capability of the illite clay zone enveloping the ore body, serving as an analogy to the engineered clay barriers. The CNSC and University of Ottawa analyzed 129I in the Cigar Lake core samples, and modeled and correlated the diffusion-dominated transport of radionuclides over the geological evolution of the Cigar Lake deposit. The results provide information on the mobility of fission products and significant radionuclides in conditions analogous to the source, engineered barriers, and near-field host rock of a DGR.The reactive transport and geochemistry of the Kiggavik-Andrew Lake uranium deposit mineralization and remobilization was another natural uranium deposit analogue studied by the CNSC. A reactive transport model was established according to the conceptualized geochemical processes and run under specified boundary and initial conditions to validate the geochemical processes. The geometry, timing, geochemistry, and fluid composition were used as model constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear TechnologySame topicRadioactive element chemistry and processingFrench-language works237,207