MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386284766 · doi:10.5114/pm.2023.128815

Response to paper by Binkowska et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism during the use of oral estrogen-progestogenhormone therapies in light of most recent research findings. Commentary: Oestradiol is not the holy grail in the quest forthe ideal oestrogen therapy

2023· article· en· W4386284766 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMenopausal Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEstrogen and related hormone effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProgestogenMedicineHoly GrailEstrogenMenopauseHormone therapyPillGynecologyInternal medicinePhysiologyPharmacologyCancerBreast cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AMA Douxfils J, Foidart J, Gaspard U, et al. Response to paper by Binkowska et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism during the use of oral estrogen-progestogen hormone therapies in light of most recent research findings. Commentary: Oestradiol is not the holy grail in the quest for the ideal oestrogen therapy. Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny. 2023;22(2):117-119. doi:10.5114/pm.2023.128815. APA Douxfils, J., Foidart, J., Gaspard, U., Chatel, G., Taziaux, M., & Jost, M. et al. (2023). Response to paper by Binkowska et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism during the use of oral estrogen-progestogen hormone therapies in light of most recent research findings. Commentary: Oestradiol is not the holy grail in the quest for the ideal oestrogen therapy. Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny, 22(2), 117-119. https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2023.128815 Chicago Douxfils, Jonathan, Jean-Michel Foidart, Ulysse Gaspard, Guillaume Chatel, Mélanie Taziaux, Maud Jost, and Céline Gérard et al. 2023. "Response to paper by Binkowska et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism during the use of oral estrogen-progestogen hormone therapies in light of most recent research findings. Commentary: Oestradiol is not the holy grail in the quest for the ideal oestrogen therapy". Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny 22 (2): 117-119. doi:10.5114/pm.2023.128815. Harvard Douxfils, J., Foidart, J., Gaspard, U., Chatel, G., Taziaux, M., Jost, M., Gérard, C., and Morimont, L. (2023). Response to paper by Binkowska et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism during the use of oral estrogen-progestogen hormone therapies in light of most recent research findings. Commentary: Oestradiol is not the holy grail in the quest for the ideal oestrogen therapy. Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny, 22(2), pp.117-119. https://doi.org/10.5114/pm.2023.128815 MLA Douxfils, Jonathan et al. "Response to paper by Binkowska et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism during the use of oral estrogen-progestogen hormone therapies in light of most recent research findings. Commentary: Oestradiol is not the holy grail in the quest for the ideal oestrogen therapy." Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny, vol. 22, no. 2, 2023, pp. 117-119. doi:10.5114/pm.2023.128815. Vancouver Douxfils J, Foidart J, Gaspard U, Chatel G, Taziaux M, Jost M et al. Response to paper by Binkowska et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism during the use of oral estrogen-progestogen hormone therapies in light of most recent research findings. Commentary: Oestradiol is not the holy grail in the quest for the ideal oestrogen therapy. Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny. 2023;22(2):117-119. doi:10.5114/pm.2023.128815.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it