MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386290139 · doi:10.3389/feart.2023.819129

Platinum-group elements (PGE) in the New Afton alkalic Cu-Au porphyry deposit, Canadian Cordillera, I: relationships between PGE, accessory metals and sulfur isotopes in pyrite

2023· article· en· W4386290139 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Brandon Boucher, Samuel J. Robb, Jacob Hanley, Mitchell J. Kerr, James E. Mungall

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Earth Science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversitySaint Mary's UniversityUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDalhousie University
KeywordsPyriteHypogeneGeologyGeochemistryPlatinum groupIron oxide copper gold ore depositsSulfideElectron microprobeMaficMineralization (soil science)MineralogyChemistryPlatinumFluid inclusionsMetallurgyQuartzMaterials scienceSphalerite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The second part of this article can be found here: 10.3389/feart.2023.819109 (DOI). At the late Triassic New Afton alkalic porphyry Cu-Au deposit (British Columbia, Canada), pyrite is a widely distributed minor sulfide phase within hypogene ore where it predates Cu mineralization and hosts significant concentrations of Pd and Pt. Here we characterize pyrite major, minor and trace element composition by EPMA and LA-ICP-MS, and S isotopes (bulk pyrite and in situ SIMS in individual growth zones) to elucidate compositional variations at different stages of pyrite growth with respect to PGE deposition. At least two cycles of zoned Co-Ni-Pd-Pt-Se-As co-enrichment are recorded over two stages of pyrite growth at the New Afton deposit. Concentrations of Co (up to ∼5.5 wt%; highest observed in any reported ore-forming system) and Ni (up to 1 wt%) overlap with pyrite from mafic-ultramafic platinum-group element (PGE) deposits, iron oxide±apatite and iron oxide-copper-gold deposits (IOA-IOCG), and mantle peridotite-associated base metal exhalative deposits. In early hypogene (type I) pyrite, high Pt (up to ∼24 ppm) occurs in crystal cores that have high Co/Ni ratio (>∼7), high Co (>∼ 1 wt%) and are poor in Ni, Se, and As. With progressive growth, early hypogene pyrite rims and late hypogene (type II) cores record an initial Ni-Pd-As-Se (±Co) co-enrichment stage, followed by oscillations in composition (from “barren” to variably Co-Ni-Pd-Pt-As-Se-enriched). Pd in pyrite (up to ∼70 ppm) is inversely correlated to Co/Ni ratio, being enriched when Co/Ni < ∼7 and Ni > ∼1000 ppm. The highest levels of Pd enrichment occur in the most Ni- and Se-enriched growth zones. The transition from early, high Co/Ni (Pt-enriched) to later, low Co/Ni (Pd-enriched) growth zones is accompanied by a decrease in pyrite δ 34 S VCDT of up to ∼7‰ (4‰ range in single grains) with a total range in composition measured between −5.5‰ and +1.4‰. Subsequent to the shift to lower values, overgrowths of high Co/Ni pyrite formed with values of δ 34 S VCDT similar to the earliest Co-Pt-rich growth zones. Some combination of fluctuations in temperature and oxygen fugacity related to episodic cooling and hydrothermal recharge involving new pulses of metal-rich magmatic fluids is required to explain the observed metal enrichment patterns and variations in S isotope values. Co-Ni-rich pyrite may be a valuable exploration vector to PGE enrichment in porphyry deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Earth ScienceSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207