MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386298813 · doi:10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_89_23

Association of Uric Acid in Oral Health, Periodontal Disease, and Systemic Disorders: A Systematic Review

2023· review· en· W4386298813 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rabiya Basari Uppin, Sheeja Varghese

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studySystematic reviewMedicineCritical appraisalPeriodontitisInternal medicineHyperuricemiaDiseaseMEDLINEIncidence (geometry)Uric acidPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The relationship between periodontitis or periodontal disease (PD) with uric acid (UA) is controversial. Furthermore, a rise in UA levels in common systemic disorders documented to be liked to PD must be understood. Objectives: The objective is to determine the association of UA levels with periodontal health and disease states by a systematic review of evidence from observational studies. Furthermore, we aimed to group secondary research papers which showed systemic diseases linked to periodontitis (SDLP) for the changes in UA levels in serum and discuss the consequences. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. The literature search was followed by qualitative assessment using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale when evaluating PD with UA associations. A similar strategic search system was used for identifying secondary studies (systematic reviews with meta-analyses or [SRMA]) for identifying UA levels in common SDLP. Results: Out of 212 selected studies, 40 underwent full-text analysis; 6 were eligible for systematic review. The current review summarizes that overall PD cases have significantly more UA levels than healthy individuals or controls from data from three observational studies. In the case of SDLP, around 8 SRMA (conducted on = 164 observational studies) revealed a significant association ( P < 0.05 in all instances) with serum hyperuricemia; cancer incidence and progression were more in women with raised UA than in men. Conclusion: The review showed that UA levels were significantly altered in PD compared to healthy individuals. However, the available evidence is inadequate to establish whether UA is diminished or elevated in periodontal disease. The SDLP all showed a significant association with raised serum UA levels with cancers affecting more women than men with high UA levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.010
Bibliometrics0.0090.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences UniversitySame topicGout, Hyperuricemia, Uric AcidFrench-language works237,207