KISAH PERJUANGAN SUKU NAGA: MENYELAMATKAN EKOSISTEM DAN MENGGUGAT PEMBANGUNAN
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Artikel ini membahas salah satu karya W.S. Rendra berjudul Kisah Perjuangan Suku Naga (1975) dengan memfokuskan pada permasalahan ekologi dalam teks tersebut. Ada dua hal persoalan lingkungan. Persoalan pertama, bagaimana masyarakat Suku Naga menyikapi rencana pembangunan tambang tembaga di tengah-tengah lingkungan alam dan budayanya? Kedua, bagaimana masyarakat Suku Naga dan pemerintah Astinam menyelesaikan konflik kepentingan itu? Isu lingkungan dalam drama ini menunjukkan terjadinya konflik kepentingan antara penduduk Suku Naga dengan pemodal yang akan membuka lahan pertambangan. Untuk membahas kedua kepentingan itu digunakan pendekatan ekokritik. Melalui pendekatan itu dapat diungkapkan relasi antara manusia dan lingkungan alam di dalam konteks konflik kepentingan. Dalam hal itu, masalah ekologi merupakan mata rantai dalam sebuah ekosistem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it