Porcine IKKε is involved in the STING-induced type I IFN antiviral response of the cytosolic DNA signaling pathway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cyclic GMP–AMP synthase and stimulator of interferon (IFN) genes (cGAS–STING) pathway serves as a crucial component of innate immune defense and exerts immense antiviral activity by inducing the expression of type I IFNs. Currently, STING-activated production of type I IFNs has been thought to be mediated only by TANK-binding kinase 1 (TBK1). Here, we identified that porcine IKKε (pIKKε) is also directly involved in STING-induced type I IFN expression and antiviral response by using IKKε −/− porcine macrophages. Similar to pTBK1, pIKKε interacts directly with pSTING on the C-terminal tail. Furthermore, the TBK1-binding motif of pSTING C-terminal tail is essential for its interaction with pIKKε, and within the TBK1-binding motif, the leucine (L) 373 is also critical for the interaction. On the other hand, both kinase domain and scaffold dimerization domain of pIKKε participate in the interactions with pSTING. Consistently, the reconstitution of pIKKε and its mutants in IKKε −/− porcine macrophages corroborated that IKKε and its kinase domain and scaffold dimerization domain are all involved in the STING signaling and antiviral function. Thus, our findings deepen the understanding of porcine cGAS–STING pathway, which lays a foundation for effective antiviral therapeutics against porcine viral diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".