MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386387803 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsad228

Scalp and hippocampal sleep correlates of memory function in drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy

2023· article· en· W4386387803 on OpenAlexafffund
Véronique Latreille, Tamir Avigdor, John Thomas, Joelle Crane, Viviane Sziklas, Marilyn Jones‐Gotman

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
KeywordsTemporal lobeEpilepsyScalpSleep (system call)PsychologyHippocampal formationNeuroscienceAudiologyHippocampusMedicineDermatologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seminal animal studies demonstrated the role of sleep oscillations such as cortical slow waves, thalamocortical spindles, and hippocampal ripples in memory consolidation. In humans, whether ripples are involved in sleep-related memory processes is less clear. Here, we explored the interactions between sleep oscillations (measured as traits) and general episodic memory abilities in 26 adults with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy who performed scalp-intracranial electroencephalographic recordings and neuropsychological testing, including two analogous hippocampal-dependent verbal and nonverbal memory tasks. We explored the relationships between hemispheric scalp (spindles, slow waves) and hippocampal physiological and pathological oscillations (spindles, slow waves, ripples, and epileptic spikes) and material-specific memory function. To differentiate physiological from pathological ripples, we used multiple unbiased data-driven clustering approaches. At the individual level, we found material-specific cerebral lateralization effects (left-verbal memory, right-nonverbal memory) for all scalp spindles (rs > 0.51, ps < 0.01) and fast spindles (rs > 0.61, ps < 0.002). Hippocampal epileptic spikes and short pathological ripples, but not physiological oscillations, were negatively (rs > -0.59, ps < 0.01) associated with verbal learning and retention scores, with left lateralizing and antero-posterior effects. However, data-driven clustering failed to separate the ripple events into defined clusters. Correlation analyses with the resulting clusters revealed no meaningful or significant associations with the memory scores. Our results corroborate the role of scalp spindles in memory processes in patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy. Yet, physiological and pathological ripples were not separable when using data-driven clustering, and thus our findings do not provide support for a role of sleep ripples as trait-like characteristics of general memory abilities in epilepsy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFrench-language works237,207