Bibliographic record
Abstract
The overview of the Spanish child protection legislation highlights the importance of children's participation in the protection system.The study analyzed 20 Spanish laws that regulate child protection and the rights of children and adolescents (CA) in the protection system (Massons-Ribas et al., 2021).The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) recognizes children's right to participation in Article 12, emphasizing the need for children to be active subjects of rights and to participate in decisions that concern them (Massons-Ribas et al., 2021).In terms of animal welfare legislation, Spain has similar legislation to Italy and Poland, as they originated from the adoption of the same European Commission (EC) directives.However, Sweden and the United Kingdom have more specific and restrictive national rules on animal welfare, which were already in force before the adoption of EC directives (Pejman et al., 2019).While animal welfare is considered an important issue in Spain, the concern is relatively lower compared to northern European countries (Pejman et al., 2019).Regarding legal protection for child victims of immoral crimes, the Child Protection Act in Spain provides comprehensive protection for children who are victims of immoral acts.This includes protection against criminal threats, discriminatory treatment, and legal proceedings.The law also ensures the fulfillment of children's rights in the process of law enforcement and provides rehabilitation for children, both medically and psychologically (LS et al., 2023).In summary, the Spanish child protection legislation recognizes the importance of children's participation in the protection system and aims to provide comprehensive protection for child victims of immoral acts.While Spain has similar animal welfare legislation to Italy and Poland, it is relatively less restrictive compared to Sweden and the United Kingdom.The legislation in Spain reflects the commitment to uphold children's rights and ensure their well-being and protection (Massons-Ribas et al., 2021; Pejman et al., 2019;LS et al., 2023).Similarly, similar laws were introduced in Australia and Canada in the 1960s and 1970s. Key Components of Spanish Child Protection LegislationThe key components of Spanish child protection legislation encompass various aspects to ensure the safety and well-being of children.These components include: This collaboration ensures a holistic approach to child protection, with multiple stakeholders working together to identify risks, provide support, and implement preventive measures.5. Prevention and Education: Spanish child protection legislation prioritizes prevention and education as key components in safeguarding children.This includes promoting awareness about child abuse and neglect, providing resources for preventative measures, and implementing education programs to equip individuals with the knowledge and skills to identify and respond to child protection issues.The Spanish legislation on child protection is comprehensive and multifaceted, focusing on various components to ensure the safety and well-being of children.However, despite these efforts and the existence of strong legislation, challenges still persist in the effective implementation and enforcement of child protection measures in Spain.According to a report by Save the Children, there is a lack of reliable data, particularly official data, to inform child protection responses in Spain.This lack of reliable data makes it difficult to fully understand the extent
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".