A multi-stack registration technique to improve measurement accuracy and precision across longitudinal HR-pQCT scans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent applications of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) have demonstrated that changes in local bone remodelling can be quantified in vivo using longitudinal three-dimensional image registration. However, certain emerging applications, such as fracture healing and joint analysis, require larger multi-stack scan regions that can result in stack shift image artifacts. These artifacts can be detrimental to the accurate alignment of the bone structure across multiple timepoints. The purpose of this study was to establish a multi-stack registration protocol for evaluating longitudinal HR-pQCT images and to assess the accuracy and precision error in comparison with measures obtained using previously established three-dimensional longitudinal registration. METHODS: Three same day multi-stack HR-pQCT scans of the radius (2 stacks in length) and tibia (3 stacks in length) were obtained from 39 healthy individuals who participated in a previous reproducibility study. A fully automated multi-stack registration algorithm was developed to re-align stacks within a scan by leveraging slight offsets between longitudinal scans. Stack shift severity before and after registration was quantified using a newly proposed stack-shift severity score. The false discovery rate for bone remodelling events and precision error of bone morphology and micro-finite element analysis parameters were compared between longitudinally registered scans with and without the addition of multi-stack registration. RESULTS: Most scans (82 %) improved in stack alignment or maintained the lowest stack shift severity score when multi-stack registration was implemented. The false discovery rate of bone remodelling events significantly decreased after multi-stack registration, resulting in median false detection of bone formation and resorption fractions between 3.2 to 7.5 % at the radius and 3.4 to 5.3 % at the tibia. Further, precision error was significantly reduced or remained unchanged in all standard bone morphology and micro-finite element analysis parameters, except for total and trabecular cross-sectional areas. CONCLUSION: Multi-stack registration is an effective strategy for accurately aligning multi-stack HR-pQCT scans without modification of the image acquisition protocol. The algorithm presented here is a viable approach for performing accurate morphological analysis on multi-stack HR-pQCT scans, particularly for advanced application investigating local bone remodelling in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".