MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386403043 · doi:10.53682/charmsains.v4i2.245

MANAJEMEN PEMBELAJARAN PARTISIPATIF BERBASIS PROJECT BASED LEARNING PADA MATERI FISIKA HUKUM PASCAL

2023· article· en· W4386403043 on OpenAlexaff
Santria Umar, Patricia Mardiana Silangen, Theresje Mandang

Bibliographic record

VenueCharm Sains Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Curriculum and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSyllabusPsychomotor learningRubricPascal (unit)Computer scienceClass (philosophy)Mathematics educationCognitionPsychologyArtificial intelligenceProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to provide a clear and comprehensive picture to students of class XI IPA 2 SMA Negeri 3 Tondano about learning management which includes planning, organizing, implementing, and evaluating participatory learning based on project-based learning on pascal’s law material in physics subjects. The method used in this research is mix method with concurrent model which is a combination of two methods, especially qualitative and quantitative. The structure of this research uses qualitative methods while quantitative methods are used to assist qualitative information. The results of this study are starting from the planning stage including the syllabus and lesson plans adapted to the strategy. The next stage is organizing which result in the function and role of management components. The implementation stage is in accordance with the syntax of participatory learning. This implementation stage shows that the implementation of management functions in participatory learning based on project-based learning on pascal’s law physics material for SMA N 3 Tondano class XI IPA 2 students can shape students’ cognitive, affective and psychomotor competencies through making learning projects. Based on the results of the study, it is concluded that planning, organizing, implementing and evaluating participatory learning based on project-based learning is well implemented as seen from the cognitive, affective and psychomotor assessment rubrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCharm Sains Jurnal Pendidikan FisikaSame topicEducational Curriculum and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207