Multiple Verdazyl Radicals Appended to a Triarylamine Scaffold
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report the synthesis of three triphenylamine-based verdazyl radicals. These include a mono, bis, and tris(verdazyl) at the 4-position(s) of the N–Ar groups, containing one, two, and three unpaired electrons, respectively. Each of these compounds is air stable, and fully characterized using EPR spectroscopy, high-resolution mass spectrometry, infrared spectroscopy, UV/Vis spectroscopy, and cyclic voltammetry. From the UV/Vis absorbance data, the optical absorbance energy gaps were found to be ~2.35 eV for all three verdazyl-containing compounds. Cyclic voltammetry was used to estimate the energy levels of the singly occupied molecular orbitals (SOMOs), which are -4.91 eV, -5.12 eV, and -4.98 eV for mono, bis, and tris(verdazyl) compounds respectively. Spin-spin exchange interactions were observed in the EPR spectra of both the bis and tris(verdazyl)s, leading to additional hyperfine coupling patterns and assignment of the ground states as triplet and quartet, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".