MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386420102 · doi:10.1007/s00723-023-01605-z

Effect of Tube-to-Pellet Diameter Ratio on Turbulent Hydrodynamics in Packed Beds: A Magnetic Resonance Velocity Imaging Study

2023· article· en· W4386420102 on OpenAlex
Scott V. Elgersma, Andrew J. Sederman, Michael D. Mantle, Constant M. Guédon, Gary J. Wells, Lynn F. Gladden

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Magnetic Resonance · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaShell Global Solutions InternationalShell
KeywordsAlgorithmMaterials sciencePhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The hydrodynamics in packed reactors strongly influences reactor performance. However, limited experimental techniques are capable of non-invasively measuring the velocity field in optically opaque packed beds at the turbulent flow conditions of commercial relevance. Here, compressed sensing magnetic resonance velocity imaging has been applied to investigate the hydrodynamics of turbulent flow through narrow packed beds of hollow cylindrical catalyst support pellets as a function of the tube-to-pellet diameter ratio, $$N$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:math> , for $$N=$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 2.3, 3.7, and 4.8. 3D images of time-averaged velocity for the gas flow through the beds were acquired at constant Reynolds number, $$R{e}_{\mathrm{p}}=$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>e</mml:mi> <mml:mi>p</mml:mi> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 2500, at a spatial resolution of 0.70 mm ( $$\tt x$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> </mml:math> ) $$\times$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> </mml:math> 0.70 mm ( $$\tt y$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>y</mml:mi> </mml:math> ) $$\times$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> </mml:math> 1.0 mm ( $$\tt z$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>z</mml:mi> </mml:math> ). The resulting flow images give insight into the bed and pellet scale hydrodynamics, which were systematically compared as a function of $$N$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:math> . Some changes in hydrodynamics with $$N$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:math> were observed. Namely, the near-wall hydrodynamics changed with $$N$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:math> , with the $$N=$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 4.8 bed showing higher velocity at the wall compared to the $$N=$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 2.3 and $$N=$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 3.7 beds. Further, in the $$N=$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> 3.7 bed, channels of high velocity, termed flow lanes, were found 1.3 particle diameters from the wall, possibly due to the bed structure in this particular bed. At the pellet scale, the hydrodynamics were found to be independent of $$N$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:math> . The results reported here demonstrate the capability of magnetic resonance velocity imaging for studying turbulent flows in packed beds, and they provide fundamental insight into the effect of $$N$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>N</mml:mi> </mml:math> on the hydrodynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it