Awareness of Consumer Rights on Marketing Practices in Kailali District of Nepal
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study is to examine the awareness status of consumer rights on marketing practices in Kailali district of Nepal. The empirical study depends on a convenience sample of 418 consumers in different locations of Kailali district with a structured questionnaire to measure consumer awareness regarding four consumer rights: Right to safety, right to be informed, right to choose and right to be heard, utilizing a five-point Likert scale for measurement. The overall findings show that the current consumers’ awareness towards marketing practices related to protection of consumer rights is medium favorable. There is significant difference among the gender, age group, occupation and educational level except location of the consumers related to the consumer awareness. In addition, consumer awareness leads to a rational buying behavior, critical thinking, right decision to purchase, improved life skills, increased self-confidence and safe from market exploitations. The outcomes of the study become important to consumers, consumer forum, business firms, government units and policy makers for understanding the current status of consumer rights with implications for better business practices issuing on policy making for consumer protection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it