MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386425842 · doi:10.1093/sexmed/qfad047

Pleasure despite pain: Associations between experiences of vulvar pleasure, vulvar pain, and sexual function in patients with chronic vulvar pain conditions

2023· article· en· W4386425842 on OpenAlexaffabout
Theodora Mautz, Maeve Mulroy, Jill M. Krapf, Andrew T. Goldstein, Caroline F. Pukall

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPleasureClitorisSexual functionMedicineAnxietyPain catastrophizingOrgasmMcGill Pain QuestionnaireChronic painSexual dysfunctionClinical psychologyPhysical therapyPsychologyVisual analogue scalePsychiatrySurgeryInternal medicinePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Chronic pain can occur in the vulva, one of the primary pleasure centers of the body; however, the associations between pleasurable vulvar experiences and chronic vulvar pain have not yet been explored. Aim The aim of this study was to investigate associations between vulvar pleasure and pain experiences in patients with chronic vulvar pain. Methods This was a prospective cross-sectional study of 547 patients (aged ≥17 years) presenting over 10 months to 2 urban outpatient gynecology clinics specializing in vulvar pain. Prior to the initial evaluation, patients completed online validated questionnaires of pain-related anxiety, pain catastrophizing, and sexual functioning, as well as a researcher-developed questionnaire evaluating vulvar pleasure. Patients were divided into groups based on their pleasure and pain experiences. Between-group analyses consisting of t-tests, analyses of variance, and multivariate analyses of variance were conducted. Outcomes Outcomes consisted of total and subscale scores on the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale-20, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Female Sexual Function Index, and a researcher-developed vulvar pleasure questionnaire. Results More than 70% of patients with chronic vulvar pain had experienced vulvar pleasure since the onset of their vulvar pain, with the clitoris as the most common source of pleasure. Average vulvar pleasure intensity was rated 7 (0, no pleasure; 10, extremely pleasurable). Masturbation ranked higher in pleasurable activities than vulvar stimulation by a partner or penetrative intercourse and was the most likely activity to lead to orgasm. When compared with patients who had not experienced vulvar pleasure since the onset of their vulvar pain, patients experiencing both pain and pleasure scored lower on the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale-20 total (P = .026) and fear subscale (P = .016), lower on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale total (P = .002) and all subscales (P = .008-.018), and higher on the Female Sexual Function Index total and all subscales (all P ≤ .001). Clinical Implications Incorporating strategies for cultivating vulvar pleasure in patients with chronic vulvar pain may be useful in comprehensive management approaches. Strengths and Limitations Strengths of this study include the novel examination of vulvar pleasure in a population with chronic vulvar pain and a large sample size. Limitations include the lack of a nonclinical comparator group and reliance on patient self-report. Conclusion Results suggest that greater vulvar pleasure is associated with lower pain-related anxiety, lower pain catastrophizing, and higher sexual functioning in patients with chronic vulvar pain conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexual MedicineSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207