MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386430116 · doi:10.4236/ti.2023.144012

Factors Influencing Change of Smallholder Organic Horticultural Farmer Organisations under Nongovernmental Organisations in Two Selected Regions in Tanzania

2023· article· en· W4386430116 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Upendo W. Mmari, Christopher P. Mahonge, Emmanuel Timothy Malisa

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnology and Investment · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Innovations and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTanzaniaSimple random sampleClosenessRespondentDescriptive statisticsQualitative propertyProductivityQualitative researchSocioeconomicsMarketingBusinessGeographyEconomic growthSociologyPolitical scienceStatisticsSocial scienceEconomicsPopulationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been the persistent failure of organic horticultural production to meet its full potential in various aspects including productivity, technological and marketing areas in various Sub Saharan countries in Africa including Tanzania. Thus, this study intended to determine whether a change of Smallholder Organic Horticultural Farmer Organisations (SOHFOs) under the local umbrella Non-governmental Organisations (NGOs)with the mandate to work within the country in coordinating SOHFOs is influenced by relational factors (their networks with other Organic Horticultural Value Chain Actors (OHVCAs)) or non-relational (other) factors. The study was conducted in Morogoro and Kilimanjaro regions in Tanzania. A study included a total of one hundred fifty nine organizations (159) that were represented with three hundred fifty one (351) respondents. From one hundred and forty nine (149) SOHFOs under local umbrella NGOs selected by simple random sampling technique and further proportionate random sampling, quantitative data were collected from two hundred and eighty nine (289) respondents and qualitative data were collected from forty four (44) SOHFOs participants. Moreover, from ten (10) managing organisations represented by eighteen (18) Key Informants qualitative data were collected. Quantitative data (relational data) were analysed using the social network analysis approach using Ghephi 0.9.2 software. For non-relational data, Statistical Packages for Social Science (SPSS) version 21 was used whereby descriptive statistics such as measures of centralities (that is closeness centralities (CCs) and betweenness centralities (BCs)) and mean scores were used to establish some of the variables of the study. Binary logistic regression model was used to predict the factors influencing change (which is regarded as use of manure) at SOHFOs under local umbrella NGOs. Qualitative data were analysed using content analysis. Results from binary logistic regression model and content analysis indicate that SOHFOs under local umbrella NGOs are experiencing change in technological area whereby, soil erosion control measures are the most used technological practice as opposed to the use of organic manure. Again, the results on predictor factors for use of manure at SOHFOs under local umbrella NGOs indicate that relational factors; that is capacity of SOHFO to access and disseminate knowledge and information to other SOHFOs and to access and spread organic horticultural products and farm inputs to other OHVCAs are the significant factors over individual organisational attribute of SOHFOs under the local umbrella NGOs in Tanzania. The study recommends policies and systems that put emphasis on relational measures for more effective organic horticultural agriculture via SOHFOs under the local umbrella NGOs in Tanzania.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechnology and InvestmentSame topicAgricultural Innovations and PracticesFrench-language works237,207