Persistent transboundary movements of threatened sharks highlight the importance of cooperative management for effective conservation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Migratory sharks play a key ecological role through movements within and among marine ecosystems, yet many populations are declining. Addressing the decline is especially challenging for wide-ranging species, as they may undertake movements between countries with disparate conservation priorities. To investigate the transboundary migrations of threatened sharks between neighbouring South Africa and Mozambique, we tracked 4 commonly occurring carcharhinid species (bull, blacktip, tiger and grey reef sharks). A total of 102 individuals were fitted with long-life acoustic transmitters and monitored for 4 yr (2018-2022) on an acoustic receiver network of 350 receivers. During this period, 63% of tagged bull sharks (n = 19), 87% of blacktips (n = 13), 94% of tiger (n = 16) and 25% of grey reef sharks (n = 3) undertook transboundary movements. The frequency of mean transboundary movements per year ranged between 1.3 ± 1.5 (SD) for grey reef sharks and 81 ± 35.6 for tiger sharks. Blacktip, bull and tiger sharks all undertook long-distance transboundary migrations ranging from 980 to 2256 km. These data confirm high connectivity between neighbouring countries by threatened sharks undertaking persistent transboundary movements. This study emphasizes the need for collaborative transboundary cooperation between the 2 countries and the alignment of regional management plans and interventions to address declining shark populations in this region of the Western Indian Ocean.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".