Awareness and Acceptability of Camarines Norte State College Vision and Mission, The Graduate School Goal and Objectives of Curricular Programs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study assessed the respondents’ extent of awareness and acceptability of the Camarines Norte State College (CNSC) vision and mission, the Graduate School goal and the objectives of curricular programs. A descriptive research survey was used in the study and employed a structured survey questionnaire in gathering the relevant data from the respondents. The findings revealed that the respondents which also identified as the stakeholders of the CNSC such as the students, parents, faculty members, employees, and alumni are highly aware on the CNSC’s vision and mission, the Graduate School goal and the objectives of its different curricular programs. Likewise, the findings revealed that the respondents highly accepted the CNSC mandates, the Graduates School goals and its different curricular objectives. Using One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), results inferred that no significant differences on the extent of awareness of the respondents in terms of CNSC vision, mission, GS Goal and in the objectives of its different curricular programs. The study recommended that there may be an extensive dissemination of the CNSC vision, mission, the Graduate School goal and the objectives of its curricular programs during the beginning of the school term and these must be disseminated sustainably through different fora and to other platform of information like College Webpage, in local TV and radio programs, posted in bulletin boards, flyers and the like.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".