The long-term performance of a bituminous geomembrane (BGM) under single-sided exposure conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A custom-designed apparatus (referred to as the Ageing Column) is used to age a 4.8-mm thick elastomeric bituminous geomembrane (BGM) under single-sided exposure to a synthetic municipal solid waste (MSW) leachate and a synthetic high pH mining solution (pH 11.5) at 55 °C, 70 °C, and 85 °C. This apparatus involves a closer simulation of the BGM's chemical exposure conditions in the field than the double-sided immersion tests in which the BGM is exposed to the solution from both surfaces. The mechanical, rheological, and chemical properties of the BGM are examined to assess the degradation in the BGM components relative to double-sided immersion experiments. While the single-sided ageing of the BGM reduces the degradation rates in the BGM mechanical properties, it does not affect the degradation rate of the bitumen coat relative to the double-sided exposure. Additionally, the exposure of the BGM to the MSW leachate resulted in faster degradation in its mechanical properties but slower degradation in the bitumen coat than that obtained in the exposure to the mining solution. However, predictions of the time to nominal failure of the BGM established using Arrhenius modelling at different temperatures show that the temperature effect is more significant on the BGM durability than the chemistry of the considered solutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".