MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386474016 · doi:10.33921/emqf2384

Relationship between mothers' and children's attitudes with and without ADHD toward elementary school and homework

2021· article· en· W4386474016 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Anna Cavenaghi, Elizabeth Baltus Hebert, J Monnier, Frédérique Roy-Côté, Gabrielle Ross, André-Ann Baril, Geneviève Scavone

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Interpersonal Relations Intergroup Relations and Identity · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParental Involvement in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderPositive attitudeAttention deficitClinical psychologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Attitude toward school predicts performance in school. Understanding the factors influencing a child’s attitude towards school is important, especially in children with an Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) who face difficulties at school. The relationship between children’s attitude, perceived by their mother, and their mother’s attitude toward school and homework will be examined. This study includes a group of 45 children with a diagnosis of ADHD (M = 9.42 year; 12 girls) and a group of 45 children without diagnoses (M = 9.42 year; 15 girls). The child’s perceived attitude toward school and homework was significantly associated with the mother’s attitude toward homework in both groups without (r = .46 and .78) and with ADHD (r = .43 and .58). A lower frequency of ADHD and a mother of older age distinguished children with a positive attitude toward school. The practical benefits are then discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Interpersonal Relations Intergroup Relations and IdentitySame topicParental Involvement in EducationFrench-language works237,207