MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effectiveness of Physiotherapeutic Interventions in a Post-Surgical Burn Patient - A Case Study

2023· article· en· W4386486420 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal For Multidisciplinary Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBurn Injury Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyPsychological interventionElbowShoulder jointRange of motionRehabilitationAnxietyQuality of life (healthcare)Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulationIntervention (counseling)Burn injurySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Burn injuries are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children. In India, the figure constitutes about one-fourth of the total burn accidents. Burn injuries can lead to scar tissue formation that further leads to functional limitations. Each paediatric burn case is unique, and a tailored approach is necessary for effective physiotherapy management. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the effects of physiotherapeutic interventions on range of motion, scar quality, pain and anxiety in post-surgical patient with a 20% second degree superficial partial-thickness flame burn. Case Presentation: A 9-years old female patient, admitted to Plastic surgery and Burn Unit, was recruited for the study. She had undergone skin grafting following the burn. Physiotherapeutic interventions were provided in two phases over 8 weeks, including exercises adjunct with ultrasound therapy and application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for 8 weeks lasted the treatment session for 60 minutes. The outcome measures used in this study were range of motion of following joints- right shoulder, right elbow joint and left shoulder joint, scores of Vancouver scar scale and scores of specific burn pain and anxiety scale. The assessments were taken at pre intervention 0 week, mid-intervention 4th and 8th week post intervention. Results and Conclusion: The findings of this study showed improvements in ROM of affected joint- right shoulder joint and right elbow joint and left shoulder joint, scar tissue quality, pain and anxiety reduction. Further research is needed to establish the relationship and determine optimal interventions for burn subjects. This study concluded the effectiveness of physiotherapy in burn rehabilitation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.539
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it