MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386493945 · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4557532

Stakeholder Endorsement Advancing the Implementation of a Patient-Reported Domain for Harms in Rheumatology Clinical Trials: Outcome of the Omeract Safety Working Group

2023· preprint· en· W4386493945 on OpenAlexaff
Dorthe B. Berthelsen, Lee S. Simon, John P. A. Ioannidis, Marieke Voshaar, P. Scott Richards, Niti Goel, Vibeke Strand, Sabrina Mai Nielsen, Beverly Shea, Peter Tugwell, Susan J. Bartlett, Glen Hazlewood, Lyn March, Jasvinder A. Singh, María E. Suarez‐Almazor, Maarten Boers, Randall M. Stevens, Daniel E. Furst, Thasia Woodworth, Amye Leong, Peter Brooks, Caroline Flurey, Robin Christiansen, OMERACT Safety Working Group

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Ethics and Regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMcGill UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutcome (game theory)StakeholderRheumatologyMedicineClinical trialInternal medicineFamily medicinePsychologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.705
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.733
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.295
Threshold uncertainty score0.364

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.7050.733
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.011
Scholarly communication0.0170.012
Open science0.0050.022
Research integrity0.0240.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
DomainReporting
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicBiomedical Ethics and RegulationFrench-language works237,207