MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386499651 · doi:10.56952/arma-2023-0214

Induced Mechanism of Stope Roof Rockbursts in Underground Excavation

2023· article· en· W4386499651 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jian Deng, Xianqu Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoofGeologyExcavationSeismologyRock mass classificationSeismic waveGeotechnical engineeringMining engineeringInstabilityUnderground mining (soft rock)Coal miningEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT A rockburst is defined as a sudden and violent disruption of rock in underground excavation. Rockbursts have been regarded as the least understood and the most feared mining disasters. Excavation-induced stress redistribution may lead to slippage of some pre-existing faults or even a new faulting in the near field of an underground opening. Both fault slippage and faulting generate seismic waves that propagate from the hypocenter outward in the rock mass. It was observed that rockbursts are induced by a seismic event when the seismic waves arrive at the free surface of the underground opening. This paper is aimed to study the mechanism of stope roof rockbursts induced by seismic waves using the dynamic buckling theory. The roof is regarded as a beam on elastic foundations under axial seismic waves. The seismic wave is modelled as an excitation with multiple frequencies. A new numerical algorithm is proposed to construct rockburst (instability) diagrams. Our study shows that the amplitude and frequency of the seismic wave play a critical role in the occurrence of roof rockbursts in terms of the mechanisms of perturbation effect and parametric resonance. Based on the mechanism analysis, insights are provided to alleviate the hazard of roof rockbursts. INTRODUCTION In Ontario, Canada, more and more underground mines are operating at depths approximately 3000 meters. With the increase of mining depth, underground mines are generally more prone to ground instability incidents. In underground mines in Ontario, ground instability has been one of the main claims of fatalities. According to statistics, nearly 50 workers were critically injured, and 10 workers died due to rock falls of ground or rockbursts in underground mines in Ontario between 2000 and 2019. A rockburst is defined as a sudden and violent disruption of rock or disturbances of roof or walls in underground excavation, which is caused by or accompanied by a "shock" or tremor (seismic event) of sufficient magnitude, to cause obvious damage to support and excavations, or widespread simultaneous fall of rock. Rockbursts can be classified in terms of the source mechanism and the damage mechanism (Durrheim 1999).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207