MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386513650 · doi:10.1097/wco.0000000000001184

Therapeutic developments for valosin-containing protein mediated multisystem proteinopathy

2023· review· en· W4386513650 on OpenAlexaff
Victoria Boock, Bhaskar Roy, Gerald Pfeffer, Virginia Kimonis

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Neurology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFrontotemporal dementiaDiseaseBioinformaticsCancer researchBiologyDementiaPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Missense mutations in valosin-containing protein (VCP) can lead to a multisystem proteinopathy 1 (MSP1) with any combination of limb-girdle distribution inclusion body myopathy (IBM) (present in about 90% of cases), Paget's disease of bone, and frontotemporal dementia (IBMPFD). VCP mutations lead to gain of function activity with widespread disarray in cellular function, with enhanced ATPase activity, increased binding with its cofactors, and reduced mitofusin levels. RECENT FINDINGS: This review highlights novel therapeutic approaches in VCP-MSP in in-vitro and in-vivo models. Furthermore, we also discuss therapies targeting mitochondrial dysfunction, autophagy, TDP-43 pathways, and gene therapies in other diseases with similar pathway involvement which can also be applicable in VCP-MSP. SUMMARY: Being a rare disease, it is challenging to perform large-scale randomized control trials (RCTs) in VCP-MSP. However, it is important to recognize potential therapeutic targets, and assess their safety and efficacy in preclinical models, to initiate RCTs for potential therapies in this debilitating disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in NeurologySame topicEndoplasmic Reticulum Stress and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207