MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386520268 · doi:10.1515/9781772126716-008

6. Becoming a Human Rights City

2022· book-chapter· en· W4386520268 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Renée Vaugeois

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Alberta Press eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman rightsPolitical scienceGeographyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Becoming a Human Rights City which led to the establishment of the John Humphrey Centre for Peace and Human Rights.Since 2005 the core work of the John Humphrey Centre has focused on building from the centre out-that is, building a human rights community.Since its inception the centre's work has grown to cover the province of Alberta, to stretch throughout the prairies, and now to reach across Canada.It made a commitment to build Edmonton as a true "human rights city," a place where everyone participates, belongs, and is included.In doing so, the centre joined an emerging movement of other cities across the world that included Rosario in Argentina and Graz in Austria, and has been inspired by Shulamith Koenig and the People's Movement for Human Rights Education. 1 At the John Humphrey Centre we made a commitment to inspire learning on human rights, for human rights are the most real in those spaces closest to home.In Eleanor Roosevelt's words:Where, after all, do universal human rights begin?In small places, close to home-so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any map of the world.Yet they are the world of the individual person: The neighborhood he [sic] lives in; the school or college he attends; the factory, farm or office where he works.Such are the places where every man, woman, and child seeks equal justice, equal opportunity, equal dignity without discrimination.Unless these rights have meaning there, they have little meaning anywhere.Without concerted citizen action to uphold them close to home, we shall look in vain for progress in the larger world. 2 The following is a reflection on the work of the John Humphrey Centre over the past 15 years to build human rights "spaces" at home in Edmonton, Alberta.In this time the centre has worked across many communities and sectors, which has resulted in the growth of a framework of theory and practice that informs its work.What has become clear in this journey is that human rights are the one thing that binds us and gives us a collective framework for demanding accountability and renée vaugeOiS

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.013
Scholarly communication0.0150.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Alberta Press eBooksSame topicHistorical and Contemporary Political DynamicsFrench-language works237,207