MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386528487 · doi:10.1080/2150704x.2023.2254912

PRO-YOLOv4-tiny: towards more balance between accuracy and speed in the detection of small targets in remotely sensed images

2023· article· en· W4386528487 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Peng Zhou, Peng Wang, Jie Cao, Yin Qiyuan

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrared Target Detection Methodologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsMinistry of EducationMinistry of Natural Resources
KeywordsComputer scienceKey (lock)Pyramid (geometry)Remote sensingPoolingFuse (electrical)Artificial intelligenceDroneComputer visionComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aiming at the problem of low accuracy of small target detection in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) aerial remote sensing images and limited computing resources of UAV platform, this paper proposes a novel real-time detection algorithm for aerial remote sensing images. Firstly, the Spatial Pyramid Pooling-Fast (SPPF) is used to fuse the global and local features in different receptive fields. Second, we propose the Drone-captured Path Aggregation Network (CPAN) to enrich the semantic features of small targets while keeping the model lightweight. CPAN adds a new detection layer and uses the fusion of deep and shallow feature information to enhance the detection of small targets. At the same time, it uses depthwise separable convolution (DSC) to reduce the number of parameters. Then, Coordinate Attention (CA) is used to capture the cross-channel information with direction-aware and position-aware information. Finally, Decoupled-Head is introduced to make the detection of classification and coordinate regression more robust. We evaluate our model based on the aerial remote sensing dataset. The experimental results show that the proposed method provides a better balance between accuracy and speed than other lightweight networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote Sensing LettersSame topicInfrared Target Detection MethodologiesFrench-language works237,207