MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386529013 · doi:10.5430/wjel.v13n8p182

Investigating the Use of E-Dictionaries as Strategy to Improve Speaking Skill through Practical Activities of Precise Phonemes Realization: Case Study of EFL Undergraduate Students of Haripur University, Abatabad University, & Hazara University Mansehra, Pakistan

2023· article· en· W4386529013 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdul Sattar, Sami Saad Alghamdi

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of English Language · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLexicography and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKing Khalid University
KeywordsPronunciationRealization (probability)Computer scienceArticulation (sociology)Active listeningMathematics educationOperationalizationLinguisticsPsychologyArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionStatisticsMathematicsCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reassessing the operationalization of e-dictionaries, the last epoch of English teaching-learning has revolutionized direct motivational currents and precise phoneme realization in undergraduates. Instructors have experienced incredible progress in improving speaking accuracy. E-dictionaries predispose undergraduates to imitate and emulate the accurate enunciation of mispronounced lexicons. Reconsidering the rapid evolution and practicing correct patterns of stereotypically distorted pronunciation have been reformed through operating E-dictionaries to rectify poor articulation. Instructors have reflected their insights regarding their prospective objectives of enhancing undergraduates’ accurate pronunciation, inflicting prompt spoken consciousness by integrating E-dictionaries into EFL classrooms for practical activities. The tenacity of the contemporary study was to determine the impact, influence, and efficacy of e-dictionary integration as an instructional strategy to measure altercations and accuracies during speech sound production. A randomization strategy and Praat quantitative data analysis were applied to determine the variation in the preference poll percentage of precision during the phonetic analysis of phoneme vocalization. The study has been categorically designed to monitor changes in English learners’ speaking, refining inaccurate pronunciation from 3.5% to 6.8% out of 10% through an Integration Model Application. The findings revealed substantial disparities during articulations. The results revealed significant differences in undergraduates’ precise realization of phonemes that improve excellence in enunciation, which leads to improvement in speaking faculty. After the integration of e-dictionaries, undergraduates recognized the distinction and amelioration of their conversations. To Investigate the use of e-dictionaries as strategy to improve speaking skill has helped to realize precise phonemes during practical activities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of English LanguageSame topicLexicography and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207