MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386536403 · doi:10.1109/jphot.2023.3309881

Time-Controlled SPAD Receivers in Optical Wireless Communication System

2023· article· en· W4386536403 on OpenAlexafffund
Junzhi Liu, Wei Jiang, Shiva Kumar, M. Jamal Deen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE photonics journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsComputer scienceElectronic engineeringIntersymbol interferenceBit error rateOptical communicationOptical wirelessBurst mode (computing)Sleep modeFree-space optical communicationWirelessReal-time computingPower (physics)PhysicsEngineeringTelecommunicationsDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single-photon avalanche diodes (SPADs) capable of single photon detection are promising optical sensors for use as receivers in optical wireless communication (OWC) systems. In SPAD-based receivers, the intersymbol interference (ISI) effect caused by dead time is an important drawback that limits performance. In this paper, we propose two novel SPAD operation modes to reduce the ISI effect in SPAD-based OWC. To validate the feasibility of these two modes, we designed a free-running SPAD front-end circuit with post-layout transient simulation results and some measurements to show its function and performance. This SPAD circuit is improved by a novel mixed passive-active quench and reset front-end circuit that achieves a very short dead time. Based on the traditional free-running mode, we design the clock-driven mode and time-gated mode to reduce the ISI effect through time-controlled operating signals. To accurately evaluate these three modes, we develop a new simulation system to assess the ISI effect in On-Off Keying (OOK) modulated communication. The simulation results demonstrate that the clock-driven mode and time-gated mode receivers can improve the bit error rate (BER) performance in low data rate communication and high data rate high optical power communication, respectively. Moreover, compared to the free-running mode, the two proposed time-controlled modes achieve higher data rate communication and better noise tolerance ability in SPAD-based OWC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE photonics journalSame topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207