MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386537575 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad137.004

PL02.2.A RAPID, COMPREHENSIVE REPORTING OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS WITH RAPID-CNS2: A PROSPECTIVE VALIDATION COHORT

2023· article· en· W4386537575 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Areeba Patel, Felix Hinz, Helin Dogan, Alexander Payne, Kirsten Göbel, Daniel Schrimpf, Michael Ritter, Eric Krause, Lukáš Pfeifer, Mathias Krech, Christina Blume, Damian Stichel, Violaine Goidts, Leonille Schweizer, Andreas Unterberg, Wolfgang Wick, Stefan M. Pfister, Martin Sill, Matthew Loose, Andreas von Deimling, David Jones, Matthias Schlesner, Felix Sahm

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsIndelTurnaround timeConcordanceDNA sequencingNanopore sequencingComputational biologySubtypingMolecular diagnosticsCopy-number variationMedical diagnosisWhole genome sequencingBiologyMedicineBioinformaticsGeneticsComputer scienceGenomeGeneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismPathologyGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND The WHO classification of CNS tumours 2021 recommends reporting a wide range of molecular alterations for WHO-compatible diagnoses. Conventional molecular diagnostic workflows warrant considerable investment and long turnaround times limited by batching. Nanopore sequencing enables long read sequencing, real-time targeting and simultaneous base modification detection with compact devices. Rapid-CNS2- a rapid, comprehensive adaptive sampling based sequencing pipeline with a turnaround time of 5 days for CNS tumours was previously described. This study presents an optimised Rapid-CNS2 pipeline and prospective validation cohort that successfully reports hard-to-detect variants. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed targeted adaptive sampling-based sequencing on 156 samples comprising a mix of archival and current diagnostic cases from the Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Heidelberg. We tested variable conditions including minimum DNA input, target size, flowcell reuse and sequencing times. An analysis pipeline for detection of single nucleotide variants (SNV), indels, copy number alterations (CNA), fusions, complex structural variants (SV), target gene methylation and methylation classification incorporating multi-GPU optimization was deployed. Results were compared to NGS panel sequencing and EPIC array analyses. RESULTS Integrated diagnoses for all cases were in accordance with those issued using molecular alterations reported by conventional analyses. Rapid-CNS2 showed improved resolution over NGS panel sequencing for CNAs. Complete concordance was achieved for MGMT promoter methylation status and methylation classification. High accuracy was obtained for detection of SNV/Indels. Long reads spanning the breakpoint identified clinically relevant fusions. Subclonal SVs including EGFR vIII missed by NGS panel sequencing were detected with high confidence. The optimized workflow shortened the turnaround time to 30 hours from sample receipt to report and minimum input DNA required was reduced to 500ng. Due to the versatility of adaptive sampling, the analyses can readily be limited to a smaller set of targets or methylation and CNAs only, further reducing the turnaround time. CONCLUSION We present a thorough validation and prospective clinical application of Rapid-CNS2 with cases spanning a range of brain tumours and metastases. The improved custom neurooncology adaptive sampling-based sequencing pipeline enables simultaneous copy-number, mutational, structural variant and methylation analysis with flexible target selection, no additional library preparation, competitive costs and next-day reporting of RESULTS

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207